Archive for the 'Technology' Category

Fixing Personal Finance Software

How much do you spend each month?
How much do you earn each month?

I’m not talking about your business, I’m talking about your personal finances.

On the surface these are simple questions.

But, I’d bet that you don’t know exactly. Why is that?

Most people can tell you more-or-less how much money they have (or don’t have!) in their main bank account. But, as soon as you throw in a credit card and perhaps a separate savings account or some investments, getting a summary and tracking movements across all of your accounts is not straight forward.

And, while every salary earner can tell you how much they make per year gross, it’s not so clear cut once you deduct PAYE, student loan repayments, KiwiSaver contributions, etc, and then perhaps throw in some interest from a savings account to top it up. If you’re paid weekly or fortnightly it can be difficult.

What’s more, in my experience, it’s surprisingly difficult to answer these two questions accurately without investing serious amounts of time in managing your finances.

It’s not that people don’t care, or prefer not to know.

Consider this quote from a former developer on the Microsoft Money team (the bits in bold are as in his original post):

“The majority of consumers who buy computers claim that personal finance management is one of the top three reasons they are purchasing a PC. They’ve been claiming this for more than a decade. But only somewhere around 2% of consumers end up using a personal finance manager, with Intuit Quicken and Microsoft Money dominating the market. Both products have been around for — you guessed it — more than a decade. This dramatic disconnect between consumer demand and actual market penetration is mind-boggling.

Take a guess at what percentage of consumers launch Money ever again, after running it only once. You’ll need to remove a digit from whatever percentage you’re currently guessing. It’s seriously that low. Granted, most copies of Money are actually pre-installed by the OEM on consumer machines, so you’re not exactly dealing with a captive audience. But we’re still looking at a huge discrepancy between expressed consumer desire and actual consumer behavior.”

Source: http://blogs.msdn.com/philipsu/archive/2004/07/01/170682.aspx

So, based on this evidence, you’d have to say that the tools are broken.

How do we fix this?

How can software help rather than hurt?

What makes it so hard at the moment?

The popular applications (Microsoft Money, Quicken, etc) are all simplified versions of business accounting packages, so they start with an assumption that you will categorise every transaction. This is where the problems begin…

Firstly, you need to come up with a set of categories that suit your spending habits. On the surface this is easy, but the devil is in the detail. For example, do you have one category for “Food” or do you split it out into “Groceries”, “Restaurants”, “Take Aways”, etc. You are forced to choose between a few high-level categories, which make it easier to categorise but don’t provide so much detail, or a nightmare of categories and sub-categories and sub-sub-categories.

Secondly, you need to get your transactions from your bank into your system. Overseas the tools integrate with the banks to automate this process, but here you need to manually log into your bank, export a file and then import into your application from there. This is a huge barrier to updating your accounts on a regular basis.

Then, assuming you can get all of that right, you still need to invest the time it takes to categorise each and every transaction each month. This is where it can quickly start to get ridiculous. If you tend to use EFT-POS a lot like I do then you’ll have hundreds of transactions to categorise each month. And if you don’t, you’ll need to remember how you spent your cash. For example, if you take $100 out from the ATM and spend it on various things over the course of a week, how do you deal with that? Or, if you buy a chocolate bar from the petrol station does that get split out or grouped in with “Petrol” or “Car” or “Transport” (or whatever category you’ve decided on to track that particular expense).

Some of the newer online tools have tried to use the advantages of the web to address some of these problems.

Wesabe allows you to tag transactions - so each transactions can be logged in multiple categories. They also recommend tags based on their community of users. Mint takes this a step further and tried to automatically code your transactions for you. The downside is that you have less control over the categories used, and have to live with some inaccuracy (they wouldn’t be able to deal with the chocolate bar and petrol example above, for example).

Wesabe has a browser plug-in which partly automates the transaction import for you. Mint fully automates this process by asking for the login details to your online banking site. As far as I can tell anybody who does this will breach the terms of use of their online banking site, and leave themselves exposed from a security perspective, so I wouldn’t recommend it.

There must be a better way!

So, let’s step back and question the assumption that underpins most, if not all, of these problems:

Do you actually need to categorise every transaction?

I don’t think so *.

Go back to the questions that I asked at the top of this post.

To answer those you simply need to be able to add up all of the money paid into your accounts (your income) and all of the money paid out of your accounts (your spending). Any transfers between your accounts can be ignored

Imagine a system which would do that automatically for you - no work required, just login and see the totals, updated each day.

And, if you could create a system that people would actually use then there are lots of potentially interesting things you could start to layer on top of that.

You could show trends to show how spending is increasing or decreasing. You could allow people to create “goals” - a savings target, or a specific debt to repay - and display a barometer to track their progress. Or, you could recommend related products or services that are likely to be of interest to that user, based on their earning and spending habits. These are the things that people actually have in mind when they say that they want to use their computer to manage their finances. But they are just three simple examples. I’m sure you can think of others.

Who could do this?

The banks should be able to do this sort of thing really easily, because they already have the transaction data. But, I’m not holding my breath.

Most online banking systems feel more like a thin layer of lipstick on a crappy underlying banking system rather than a web application designed with any consideration for what the users wants to do. And, while it may be a little unkind, I just don’t back a large bank to be able to execute on this sort of application.

And any bank that tried to do this would need to work out how to source transaction data from other banks so that all accounts can be included (this actually isn’t as unlikely as it sounds - when I was in the UK I used Egg.com for my online banking, and they were able to display transactions from my HSBC accounts via their clever Money Manager system).

So I reckon this is an opportunity waiting for somebody to grab it.

Perhaps I should suggest this to the team at Xero?

* If you’re stuck with a system that insists you categorise every transaction, you can get the same results by limiting yourself to just two categories: “Income” and “Expense”.

Related posts (manually generated):

Additional reading:

It’s mostly unrelated to the topic of this post, but the MSDN blog I linked to above is actually quite entertaining. He seems to write one excellent blog post each year. I like his style! :-)

Using large data sets

Peter Norvig (the Director of Research at Google) started off his ETech presentation with a diagram showing how things used to be (back in the old, old days … like 1994):

Data

At the core, in the past, was the algorithm. Inputs were pretty simple (mouse clicks, keyboard entry). Outputs were equally simple (text, user interface). Data was used simply as a store of input and output. All of the effort and focus went into creating smart algorithms.

However the massive data sets that Google now has access to allows them to flip this model around. Rather than creating complex, elaborate, (and probably inaccurate) algorithms by hand they instead use a simple statistical model and let the data do the work.

He gave several examples. The most obvious is the Google spell checker which using this approach can guess what you might have meant, even where the words you’re looking for don’t appear in any dictionary (e.g. http://www.google.com/search?q=rowan+simson).

Another is their translation tool which can be trained to convert any text where there are enough examples to “learn” from. Ironically, the limiting factor now with this approach is not the software but the quality of the human translators used for training.

In each case being able to do this simply comes down to having enough data.

This is one of those ideas which is so obvious after you’ve seen it:

If you have lots of data the way you think about algorithms changes completely

XMPP

Phil from Xero pointed me at this article about XMPP (a.k.a. Jabba):

XMPP (a.k.a. Jabba) is the future for cloud services

What do you think? Has anybody done anything interesting with this that you’re using or know of?

It would be interesting to hear about how you find it.

Coming soon

Lance highlights a problem that needs to be dealt with by all Apple aficionados.

Broadly speaking, Apple are a company that make amazing new products which will be released soon.

They often don’t announce release dates until they arrive. And, as I’ve mentioned previously, they don’t seem to have any issue with selling the old version of the products right up until that date. As a result there is a lively ecosystem of rumour sites which offer up various advice about which products to buy when and why.

This is an extreme version of Barry Schwartz’s Paradox of Choice - not only do you have to choose between the various products and options that are available to buy now, you also need to consider what might (but also might not) be available to buy at some near point in the future.

What can you do?

For a while I subscribed to a few of the rumour sites and tried to keep up with it all, but that got too tiring. I’m obviously not a true fan-boy. I abandoned that when I culled my feeds. Life, surprisingly, has gone on.

Thankfully I didn’t labour the decision when I got my iPhone. I didn’t even have to choose between the 16GB and 8GB model, as they only had the 8GB model in stock the day I was at the Apple Store in San Francisco. As per the book referenced above, one choice means far less room for regret.

So, Lance, my advice …

Buy an iPhone. You’ll love it. There are lots of reasons for this, which I’ll save for a future post, but suffice to say it really kicks ass. You can afford it. What’s more, I doubt the 3G version if and when it’s released and available here will be so much better that you’ll wished you waited, and if it is, you can always sell the old one and upgrade then.

Paul Buchheit on Product/Market Fit

Here’s an interesting response to the great Marc Andreessen post on Product/Market Fit (which I can’t believe I haven’t linked to from here before now!)

“What’s the right attitude? Humility. It doesn’t matter how smart and successful and qualified you are, you simply don’t know what you’re doing. The good news is that nobody else does either, though some are foolish enough to think that they do (and that’s why you can beat them).

What is the humble approach to product design? Pay attention. Notice which things are working and which aren’t. Experiment and iterate. Question your assumptions. Remember that you are wrong about a lot of things. Watch for the signals. Lose your technical and design snobbery. Whatever works, works.”
The most important thing to understand about new products

I like the idea of humble product design.

Paul used to work for Google and was the guy who wrote Gmail.

His own story is a goodie:

“I wrote the first version of Gmail in one day. It was not very impressive. All I did was stuff my own email into the Google Groups (Usenet) indexing engine. I sent it out to a few people for feedback, and they said that it was somewhat useful, but it would be better if it searched over their email instead of mine. That was version two. After I released that people started wanting the ability to respond to email as well. That was version three. That process went on for a couple of years inside of Google before we released to the world.”

Katakana spam

I’m not sure how I would manage without the Gmail spam filter.  A consequence of having my email address published for any nefarious spiders to pick up, I suppose.

But, even then, it’s not perfect.  I’ve had a couple of important messages spammed by mistake and so remain unread.  So, I try and look once a week just to make sure I’m not missing anything.

Lately the volume of messages has exploded, and the vast majority of them appear to be coming from Asia:

Asian Spam

Is this just me or are others seeing the same thing?  Any idea what’s behind this?

Amnon on Lossless

Here is an interesting comment I got via email from Amnon (one of my former colleagues from Trade Me) about my lossless post from earlier in the year:

“I really liked your post on storage and compression, but consider this: Two years ago people were paying $500 for a 60GB iPod. Today they’re paying $500 for an 8GB iPod. Storage capacity is up against other factors in evolving technology. Miniaturisation, reduction of moving parts, wireless network storage… At some point ears can’t tell the difference with a compressed music file, and your eyes (and monitor) won’t benefit from a 12MP photo that will only ever be printed in 6″ x 4″, if at all. But when the first finger-sized quantum portable PC comes out, maybe you’ll be stoked all your photos aren’t saved in RAW format. Just a thought… Plus, how could people download all those movies and albums if they weren’t compressed? ; )”

What do you think? I’m interested in your comments.

Is compression a worthwhile trade off in order to gain mobility?

What about when you’re back home with your fast network, big screen displays, quality amp & speakers etc? Don’t you really want the best quality source files you can store?

Do we even have to choose? Is there an easy way that people could store hi-res full quality files in a central location on a home network and somehow easily sync compressed files to our mobile devices?

Fire away.

The opposite of less

Via: JonesBlog

Wow!

There is actually an (almost reasonable) explanation for this.

Me? I’m happy with one big monitor. It seems a nice compromise between productivity and less “stuff” on my desk. Perhaps I should add it to my list?

ETech

I had a blast at ETech in San Diego.

At every turn there was somebody interesting to meet, chat with or listen to.

I took a ton of notes, with good intentions of turning them into a blog post, but that’s not going to work out.

Instead here are four random/great quotes from the week:

  • Steve Cousins, responding to a question about his proposed open source platform for personal robots: “In the civilian robotics area we don’t really use the words ‘killer application’”
  • “Exercise - the poor mans plastic surgery” - from Kathy Sierra slideware.
  • Nat Torkington, via Twitter, in response to an Ignite presentation by Noel Dickover from the US Department of Defense: “General rule for ETech speakers: ‘decreasing the kill chain’ tends not to be the goal of the average attendee.”
  • Tim Ferris, explaining why his PDA doesn’t have an internet connection: “I don’t trust an inbox in my pocket any more than I trust dark chocolate in my house.”

And, one quirky website:

Finally if you have six and a half minutes to spare, you should check out Saul Griffith’s Ignite presentation on Howtoons (which I can recommend if you have some young kids to entertain) from the first night of the conference:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=wyLHOTwvzf4

Saul is a super smart but friendly Aussie, who also did a keynote later in the conference on Energy Literacy, which was also excellent. I really hope this will be available online sometime soon so I can link to it. In the meantime this interview gives you a bit of the flavour:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=wbwxF47×5ss

My name is Rowan, I’m an addict

Some say the first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem.

For the last month or so I’ve been using a great tool called RescueTime to help me put some hard numbers around the size of my computer addiction.

RescueTime is a YCombinator company, and part of the latest in-take. They have just recently made their tool available to the public. As you would expect they are iterating quickly at this point, and it seems to be getting better and betters as they tweak it.

The system is very simple - you just run a small application in the background (available for both Windows and Mac) and this records which applications and websites you are working on throughout the day. You can login to see a summary of this information, with pretty graphs, on the website. You can also tag applications and pages to help identify specific items or groups.

For example, here is a summary of the number of hours I spent using my laptop during February:

RescueTime data for Feb

The red is Email and the yellow is Yojimbo (which I use to keep track of notes, including keeping myself organised and draft blog posts/ideas etc). The grey is everything else.

As you can see the trend is awful, although exacerbated by the fact the the last week of the month was my last week at work (if it were a one-day manhatten then after a quiet start the innings accelerated nicely with some big slogging in the final overs) …

But, with the excuses out of the way, over 165 hours is much more time that I would have guessed I spent doing this sort of thing. Which is exactly the point - there is no need to guess (incorrectly) anymore. This tool helps put some hard numbers around it and allows you to be much more aware of the time you spend staring at a screen.

I suppose some people might be pleasantly surprised by the results they get, but I suspect that most (like me) will be prompted to aim for less.

Our Information State Highway

We have some friends from the UK staying with us at the moment, so I’m in the habit of making excuses for our infrastructure.

To anybody who has driven on the motorways overseas what we call “State Highway 1″ is a bit of a joke.

Seriously … one winding lane each way with no median barrier?

And where are all of the cars?

Likewise, what we call broadband really isn’t.

The international speakers who were here for Webstock last week were too polite to complain about it in front of us, but you can tell what they really thought by reading their twitters.

How embarrassing.

Full credit to Jeremy Wells from one of his ‘Unauthorised History of New Zealand’ episodes for the title of this post.

Registration Revolution

If you do any traveling and you haven’t yet discovered TripIt.com I strongly encourage you to check it out.

(You also need to go and subscribe to Joel Spolsky’s RSS feed. He wrote about this at the end of last week, and if you’re reading my blog and not following his articles then you clearly have things in the wrong order).

All you need to do is find a booking confirmation email from an airline, hotel or rental car company and forward it via email to plans@tripit.com. They will convert your email into a simple itinerary page for your trip and send you back a link. If you have other bookings to include in the same itinerary, simply forward them on.

No more searching through your inbox to find all of these confirmation emails before your trip, which is good.

But, what’s really great in my opinion is that they have revolutionised the registration process. In fact they have eliminated the registration process altogether. By making the first interaction email based there is no need to fill in a cumbersome form on the website - entering you email address twice to make sure you don’t have any typos, choosing a password (which we all know usually means entering the same password you use on more or less every site), waiting for a confirmation email and then clicking on the link to validate that your email address is actually yours, etc etc. All of that is history.

I really like this idea - replacing a complex process with a simple email - and I think it could probably be used in lots of different situations.

Are there other websites ballsy enough to replace their entire registration page and process with an email address?

Are there any other examples of email-as-interface that you’ve seen out there? If so, I’m keen to hear about them.

Lossless

What format is your digital music?

Most of mine are MP3s encoded at 256 kbps. That was a somewhat random choice made at the time that I ripped the bulk of my CDs a couple of years back.

Most … but not all, as I recently discovered when trying to move some of the music onto my Mac laptop. I found (more accurately: was reminded) that some of the albums were encoded in a lossless WMA format, which was pretty useless when it came to importing them into iTunes, so a converter was required [1].

On the surface the various digital music formats are a simple trade off between sound quality and file size.

At the top end (maximum quality, largest file size) are the so-called lossless encryption methods - as described in this Steven Levy article. The one I used was supplied with Windows Media Player and so created WMA files, but I notice that there is an alternative Apple Lossless format available within iTunes. I don’t expect either of these are commonly used.

All other alternative formats use some form of compression to create smaller files. MP3 is just one of those - although clearly the format of choice for the vast majority of people.

This is where it starts to get somewhat mysterious, even for people like myself who like to think they are somewhat technical. How much better is a 128 kbps MP3 vs. a 256 kbps MP3? Surely at some point you reach the limit of the CD you’re ripping from? How good does your stereo and speakers need to be in order to even hear the difference? Perhaps a reader will be able to enlighten us all on some of these things.

It does also beg the question as to why we’re compressing music at all.

There is a great story (a myth as it turns out [2], but let’s not let that get in the way) about how they chose the compression ratio when putting together the technical specifications for CDs so that the discs were as small as possible but still able to fit the entire length of Beethoven’s 9th Symphony. The result was a sampling frequency of 44.1 kHz.

That was 1981 and made sense because they were constrained by the capacity of the physical disc.

Likewise in 1994 the first computer I bought had a 200 MB hard drive, which was only just big enough to fit a few albums of MP3 files.

But today that constraint is well and truly gone. Disk space is now abundant. I can fit many more songs than I own on an iPod. Yet despite that we still compromise quality to keep file sizes down, which seems a bit odd.

Along the same lines …

Do you take photos at the highest resolution your digital camera allows?

The highlight of 2007 for me was the arrival of baby #2 in April. This provided a perfect excuse to splash out on a new digital camera, which came complete with 10 mega pixels (an embarrassing abundance, surely?)

However, after using it for a couple of days (and thankfully before the baby arrived) I was surprised to discover that by default the camera was set to a resolution much lower than the maximum it supported.

Why? I can only assume it was because the memory card that came supplied with the camera was so small that it would fill up almost immediately at the maximum resolution. But I had also splashed out on a bigger card, which had room for hundreds of images, so that constraint didn’t apply [3].

Thinking about this reminded me of my own baby photos, which are easily recognised as coming from the mid-1970s due to their square shape and rounded corners (not to mention the funny looking clothing that all the grown-ups are wearing!) By the time my younger brother and sisters came along the technology had moved on and so all of their photos are the more modern 6″x 4″ size.

I realised that the same will be true for my own kids too.

Technology moves on quickly, but we users are not always so quick to adjust to those things that are the constraints.

So, please, encode your music at the highest quality your software allows and make sure that your camera is set to the highest resolution [4].

You’ll be glad you did in a few years time.

Notes:

[1] If you run into similar problems I can recommend an excellent free utility called Switch which allows you to convert a WMA file into an MP3, albeit at the expense of the tags identifying the artist, album etc.

[2] As Kees Immink, one of the engineers who worked on the original CD specification explains, the choice of 44.1 kHz was really the only choice available to the engineers due to the recording equipment available at the time, and the size of the discs themselves was more of a management/marketing decision than an engineering one - they wanted them to be the same size as a cassette tape (as it turns out the engineers had the final say - the discs are 0.5 cm larger than cassette tapes at their widest point, providing CDs with significant additional surface area).

[3] This is another excellent example of software designers not thinking about the “Pit of Success”. Ideally the camera would have prompted me when I inserted the larger memory card for the first time to suggest I increase the resolution settings. Or, even better, the camera would come with a sufficiently large card in the first place!

[4] In case this suggestion seems to contradict my theme of less I should point out that I’m not suggesting more music or more photos just higher bits rates and resolutions.

As with anything, removing one constraint just highlights another.

In the past the constraint with photography was always the number of photos you could take - especially going back to the days of 24 frames per roll of film (younger readers, please ask your parents to explain this crazy concept). With a digital camera and lots of memory that’s no longer an issue. But, it occurs to me that the new constraint now is finding the great photos amongst the 1000s that you can so quickly and easily rattle off

(This, by the way, is a problem that technology might be able to solve - tools like Flickr’s Interestingness have started to do this automatically for a larger set of photos. Imagine if you could do something similar for the photos on an individual hard drive. There’s gold in them hills I reckon!)

If you take the time to delete the average photos you’ll enjoy the really good ones much more. Likewise with music - take some time to delete the tracks you don’t like from the albums you rip. Your ’skip’ button will thank you for it.

So, perhaps the new constraint is time?

Etsy is Swimmy

What a great way to announce an investment round…

Etsy’s first five years

Watch the video which is part of this announcement - it’s excellent.

“Etsy is a young company: we’re not yet three years old, the majority of our employees are under 35 years of age, and we have an exuberance that knows no age. We have certainly had our fair share of what I call ‘conducting our education in public,’ and this is something I am proud of.

Throughout the myriad challenges since we launched the website, we have worked day and night to see things through. We’re in this for the long haul. We believe that the world cannot keep consuming the way it does now, and that buying handmade is part of the solution.”

They are wise beyond their years I’d say and have an inspiring vision for their company.

And, oh yeah, they just raised $27m to help them get there.

You have no new messages

If you’re New Years resolution includes “less inbox”, you should check out this great presentation from Merlin Mann:

Inbox Zero: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=973149761529535925 (slides)

Getting your inbox under control is bloody hard and keeping on top of it is a constant battle.

Compared to the alternative, though, it’s worth the effort.

And it doesn’t necessarily mean spending your whole day on email.

In fact, the opposite…

One small tip which made a big difference for me was changing my email settings to only check for new messages every 15 minutes, and then later every hour.

Unlike some other changes which require you to turn your life upside down, this is completely easy to do right now (go on … I’ll wait here until you’re done).

Think of it as a way to slowly wean yourself off a dangerous addiction.

It’s interesting since I did this how often somebody will come to my desk or phone before I’ve actually cleared their message and say something like “I just sent you an email …”. Why? Just checking that I got it I suppose? Or, perhaps they are anxious that I haven’t responded yet.

When all you do all day is hang out with other crack addicts then it doesn’t seem so dangerous to take it yourself, I guess?

None of this is especially new. There are lots of good inbox management ideas out there. But, which ones are you actually using every day?

Wie komme ich am besten zum Bahnhof, bitte?

This is cool…

A heads-up car navigation system which draws a three dimensional “virtual cable” for you to follow to your destination. All you have to do is imagine you’re a trolly bus! :-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mljbWzI6miE

More info and better quality videos on their site: http://www.mvs.net/

Found via: Springwise

Google home page

Here is a question for all of you Firefox power users …

When was the last time you saw the Google home page? As opposed to jumping straight to the search results page from the search box in the top right of your browser.

When you read how much Google is prepared to pay for search traffic from Firefox, you can understand why Microsoft decided to start investing again in Internet Explorer.

Here is the latest search engine market share report I could find, from September ‘07:

Search Engine Market Share
Google 54.0%
Yahoo! 19.5%
MSN/Live 12.0%
AOL 6.0%
Ask.com 2.2%
All others 6.3%

Source: Neilsen via SearchEngineWatch.com
(http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3627422)

I wonder how much of this traffic is provided direct from browser search boxes?

Upgrade to XP

Juha links to this classic review of Windows XP, written from the perspective of somebody who has just “upgraded” from Vista.

Funny only because it’s true, I suppose. :-)

PS. Anybody who has a whole category of their blog devoted to “p***ing contests” deserves respect!

Image Retargeting

Many of you will, I suspect, have already seen this.

Nonetheless it is amazing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qadw0BRKeMk

I love it when technology feels like magic. :-)

Via: http://blog.markerstudio.com/archives/318

Living in an Amish paradise

Here is a great Howard Rheingold article from the Wired Magazine archives about Amish in the US and their unique approach to using various technologies in their day-to-day lives:

Look who’s talking

I first read this back in the late ’90s (when, I admit, I was a bit of a Wired fanboy) and the criteria for what technology they adopt vs. shun has stuck in my head:

“Does it bring us together or draw us apart?”

You can agree or disagree with their view of the world, but I don’t think you can fault them for having a values-based way of making decisions about this sort of thing.

I like the idea of being in control of the technology you use rather than the other way around.

(Did I mention that I still haven’t upgraded to Leopard yet? ;-)

Think about this in terms of the technologies you use:

  • Are you in control of your TV?
  • Are you in control of your inbox?
  • Are you in control of your mobile phone?

If you answered ‘yes’ to that last question, do you take your phone with you to face-to-face meetings? And if so, do you answer it when it rings?

(By the way, before I get too self-righteous, I’ll be the first to admit that occasionally I do take my phone to meetings, as rude as that is, and my inbox consumes far too much of the time that could be better spent with family and friends.)

Is your use of all of these technologies mindful, or did you just fall into it?

What criteria do you use to decide when to start using a new technology?

Sometimes, I reckon, it’s good to step back and think about these things.

With this in mind, I wonder what the Amish make of blogs?

Like wearing a shirt with buttons, I suspect they would consider writing a blog much too “prideful”.

:-)

Next Page »


Contact Details

Rowan Simpson
PO Box 3210
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

Categories

Policy

These words are my own. Please don't assume that they represent the opinion of Xero, Trade Me or any other person or organisation.

And, if you want to quote me please either ask first or provide a link back.